What is an example of victim-shaming language to avoid in discussions about sexual violence?

Victim-shaming language refers to statements or implications that blame the victim for the violence they experienced. This type of language can be harmful as it shifts responsibility from the perpetrator to the victim, contributing to stigma and discouraging individuals from speaking out about their experiences.

In this context, phrases that imply the victim's behavior led to the assault reinforce harmful stereotypes and societal norms that unjustly place burden on victims. For instance, suggesting that a victim was somehow responsible for their assault due to their clothing, behavior, or circumstances is a clear example of victim-blaming. Such statements can perpetuate the cycle of violence and discourage survivors from seeking help, leading to feelings of shame and isolation.

On the other hand, emphasizing the need for consent and promoting community support for survivors are crucial elements in discussions about sexual violence that help create a safer environment and facilitate healing. These approaches focus on accountability and understanding rather than perpetuating guilt and shame among victims.